P

Partakers of the Divine Nature

The phrase “partakers of the divine nature” comes from Peter who says, “His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire” (1 Pet. 1:3-4). This is foundational to participating in the Council of the Lord, which in turn is foundational to the essence of Basileia’s charism. We become partakers of the divine nature via Theosis, but not by our human nature coming into union with God’s divine nature, which happens uniquely only in Jesus where both human nature and divine nature are in unity in His Person. We partake of God’s nature by our human nature coming into union with God’s divine energies, which animate our restored human nature in Christ. This happens in a way where there is no mixture or confusion between God’s energies and our human nature. It is helpful in grasping what divine energies are to contrast these with the divine essence. The essence of God is His transcendent otherness. His energies are His immanent nearness. God's essence is transcendent, unknowable and incommunicable while His uncreated energies are immanent, knowable and communicable. A God of essence only would be a self-enclosed God, unable to communicate outside of Himself. But God is not only essence, He is also energy by which He communicates Himself outside of Himself to His creation. Thus in our partaking of the divine nature, God’s energies and our nature both remain distinct and yet are related just as when an iron poker left in a hot fire takes on all the characteristics of the fire and yet remains distinct from the fire. Glowing red-hot, the poker gives off light and heat just like the fire, but remains what it was before, an iron poker. The poker partakes of the energies of the fire; it does not in its nature become fire. If it is removed from “union” with the fire, it will cease to glow red-hot. In its likeness with the fire, the poker is not the source of the energies that create that likeness but is only a partaker of the energies of the fire. In a similar way, God designed human nature to partake of the divine nature in the sense of absorbing and manifesting His divine energies, not by being blended with His nature. After Moses’ face-to-face encounter with God in His energies, when Moses came down from the mountain, his face shone like the sun.

Also see Council of the Lord, Shine Like the Sun, and Theosis.

Passion

Passion, as the first dynamic of our charism related to our primary discipline of journeying, inspires us to journey. The source of this passion is the Father’s “good pleasure” in uniting in Christ all things in heaven and on earth (Eph. 1:9). It is because the Father is “well pleased” with us that He anoints us with the Spirit and sends us forth to minister justice in a chivalric manner until the cause of justice is brought forth to victory (Matt. 12:18-21). We journey out of passion, not fear, knowing that the Father is “well pleased” with us in Christ. Through our Liturgy, Catechism and Canons we seek union with Christ in His passion, as “the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Heb. 12:2). Such joyful passion makes the Church the Church. A joyless Christianity is not Christianity. Joyless worship is not Christian worship. And a joyless Church is not Christ’s Church. The gospel begins and ends with great joy. At the gospel’s beginning “the angel said to them, ‘Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which will be to all people.’” (Lk. 2:10) And at the gospel’s end “they worshiped Him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy” (Lk. 24:52). The Father says, “Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord” (Matt. 25:21). While we eat bread and drink wine in the Liturgical celebration of the Eucharist, this kingdom act “is not about eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit” (Rom. 14:17). A joyless, passionless Basileian is not a Basileian. We enter into passion by responding to the Father’s passion.

Also see Convergence, Empowerment, Transformation, and Wisdom.

Pattern-Keepers

Basileians are Pattern-Keepers who in the practice of interpreting the Word according to the Apostolic Rule of Faith create a peaceable and orderly way of life grounded in the certain knowledge of God’s will verses the disorder of the uncertain knowledge and will of autonomous man. This prophetic lifestyle practice is related to our primary discipline of listening to the Word. 

Also see Certain Knowledge, Listen, Overcomers, and Storytellers.

Perspectival

Two or more things that are perspectivally related re-present the same thing from different angles or perspectives. This way of looking at things is basic to kingdomculture since the nature of God Himself as Trinity is foundational to the order of created reality. With the Trinity, for example, while God is One Person, He is also Three Persons who each perspectivally re-present uniquely the whole of who God is. While we as creatures will never exhaustively understand this like God Himself does, by revelation we can truly understand it and then by choice make it the solid basis of our certain knowledge in this and all areas of thought and life. Other applied examples of perspectivalism include the three complementary expressions of the Church in Convergence, the three complementary expressions of the Body of Christ, the three complementary basic offices of mankind as priest, prophet and king. Examples of perspectivalism practically applied to Basileia include the fact that our Liturgy, Catechism and Canons are all interdependent and ultimately identical, not in form, but in meaning.

Also see Certain Knowledge, Convergence, Emphasize, and Mystery.

Presbyter

Presbyters have two basic governing functions: 1) to guard the confessional boundaries, such as those expressed in the Constitution of Basileia and 2) administrate the addition or removal of members according to those boundaries. Such guardianship is a function of the Table and only Presbyters are authorized to admit or remove (i.e., excommunicate) individuals from the Table. It is true that all members of God's covenant community have a general representative authority to guard the confessional boundaries of the community. Every member is to be a covenant-keeper in this general sense. However, Presbyters have a special representative, collective role in addition to this, made concrete by what is involved in guarding the Table. To grasp exactly what this special role is requires that we first emphasize that all members have a general authority to bind and loose that which has already been bound and loosed in heaven (Matt. 16:19; 18:18). All members of God's covenant community are accountable to operate within those confessional standards of the community that are consistent with the Apostolic Rule of Faith. As Jesus teaches, all members are to deal with the sin of another member by going to that person and dealing with the sin at issue. This is to happen just “between you and him” and then, if “he will not hear you,” “one or two more” members are to get involved (Matt. 18:15-16). This is the governing role of members acting in their capacity as individuals. However, when this has run its course and the member whose sin is being dealt with still does not repent, then Jesus says, “tell it to the Church” (Matt. 18:17a). The special role of Presbyters in this case, if the member “refuses to hear the Church,” is to conduct an excommunication (Matt. 18:17b). This is the governing role of elders acting in their collective capacity. While individuals are to confront breaches of the covenant according to their governing capacity as individuals, only Presbyters of the Church, acting as collective representatives of the Church (i.e., as covenantal heads), may excommunicate members from the Church. This also implies that Presbyters acting in their collective capacity are also authorized to readmit repentant members or admit new members to the Church. Furthermore, as is illustrated by the consensus decision-making process of the Church in Acts 15, the Church clarifies its confessional boundaries through the collective representative agency of her Presbyters. Thus Presbyters, in their collective representative capacity, enable the community collectively (not just members individually) both to (a) define her “constitution” and (b) to defend that constitution through her courts. Both of these functions are two basic marks of any nation or society, such as the Church. While individuals within a Christian society are to form educational, vocational, and associational structures in line with divinely revealed confessional standards, elders in general and Presbyters of the Church in particular enable the whole community collectively to identify, define, and defend the boundaries of the society. The individual governing authority of individuals can only be exercised within the boundaries defined and defended by the collective governing authority provided by elders of the “congregation.” This is an inescapable concept. Individuals never actually exercise authority in a vacuum, rather the only question is: In which collective context do individuals exercise their individual representative authority? In the context of the Kingdom of Man or in the context of the Kingdom of God? The difference between these two kingdoms is whether the authority of a society is mediatorial (as in the Kingdom of Man) or ministerial in nature (as in the Kingdom of God). If Presbyters exercise collective ministerial authority, then individuals are free to exercise the full potential of their individual authority, giving rise to the Kingdom of God. But if Presbyters are mediatorial, then it gives rise to the operations of the Kingdom of Man.

Also see “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia,” Head, and Presbyter Councils.

Presbyter Councils

A Presbyter Council is a governing body of Presbyters of a jurisdiction authorized to do only two things governmentally: 1) guard the Constitution of Basileia and 2) admit and remove members. Presbyter Councils govern in a complementary fashion with Deacon Councils and Missional Councils. While the functions of a Presbyter Council may initially be handled by a founding Presbyter of a jurisdiction, as the jurisdiction grows the convention of employing an Executive Team will be needed in managing the consensus decision-making process among groups of Presbyters numbering, in general, more than 12. Basileia has the following six types of Presbyter Councils:

  1. Alliance Presbyter Council.
  2. Community Presbyter Councils.
  3. Fellowship Presbyter Councils.
  4. Abbey Presbyter Councils.
  5. Society Presbyter Councils.
  6. Chapter Presbyter Councils.

 Also see Deacon Councils, Missional Councils, and Presbyter.

Presiding Abbot

A Presiding Abbot is the Head a Presbyter Council for an Abbey, or the Basileia Alliance, or a Basileia Community, or a Vocational Society, and thus by definition is tasked with facilitating the consensus decision-making process in the governing of those jurisdictions. In addition to Presiding Abbots, Basileia also has Abbots at-large who may be on sabbatical, or having served as Presiding Abbots sometime in the past are presently serving as general members of any of Basileia’s Presbyter Councils, maintaining the title of Abbot in recognition of the appointment or consecration to that role. Some Abbots may take on an at-large role in being Soul Friends and mentoring others or focusing on publishing or entering into an extended period of asceticism. While an Abbot at-large may command a greater capacity of spiritual authority in certain dimensions than, say, another Abbot or Presbyter who may be presiding as a Head of a jurisdiction, this does not mean that an Abbot at-large may usurp or replace the role of that Head either wittingly or unwittingly. Some Abbots at-large may have a disproportionate weighty contribution to make in the consensus decision-making process even though they may not be serving presently in a formal presiding role as the Head of a jurisdiction. Therefore, humility on the part of all is needed to actualize the contributions of all in this and similar situations that emerge with having Abbots at-large actively serving alongside others serving as Heads. Furthermore, the general principles here regarding the consensus decision-making process as it applies to Abbots may also be applied to the respective roles of Presbyters, Deacons, Commissioned Governing Members and baptized members in any jurisdiction.

Also see Abbot.

Presiding Member

A Presiding Member is a Basileian who has been elected to lead a Council in general and also, if the Council has an Executive Team, of the Executive Team in particular. The only time a Presiding Member may properly be referred to as a Head is in the case when it is a Presbyter or Abbot who is the Presiding Member of a Presbyter Council. A Presbyter or Abbot serving as the Presiding Member of a Deacon Council or Missional Council is not exercising headship since these Councils exercise individual governing authority in contrast to collective governing authority.

Also see Council, “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia,” and Head.

Priestly

Priestly authority is given to mankind in general, along with prophetic and kingly authority. Jesus identifies Himself as being the embodiment of the priestly when He says, “I am the Way” (Jn. 14:6). As Basileians, we cultivate this priestly way of being authentically human as 1) Worshipers who engage in Eucharistic worship, beginning on Sundays, 2) Soul Friends who love and help others to belong in order to believe, 3) Storytellers who follow the lectionary in rhythm with the Church Year, 4) Sentinels who welcome all able to come to the Table and 5) Hosts who offer hospitality to all already within the Church and to those yet beyond the Church. Both Jesus and the Christian faith are called the “Way” because Christ calls us to journey with Him and be like Him (Acts 9:2; 19:7-9). The end of our journey is therefore not so much an “end” in the sense of a destination beyond which we travel no more, but the purpose or goal of becoming “perfect,” as our “heavenly Father is perfect.” It’s a way of life without end. By “end” in this priestly way of life we mean the purpose, goal, objective and intention for why we travel this way. We constantly and continually make progress along the way, never coming to a “dead end” where no further progress is possible. We travel this way now since we shall also continue to travel this way in the ages to come. If it’s good enough for “forever,” then it’s good enough for now. We will never graduate from being priestly and being conformed ever more to the likeness of Him Who is the Way. Furthermore, in this way of life we distinguish between the general priestly authority of individuals and the special, collective priestly authority of elders in general and of Presbyters of the Church in particular.

Also see Hosts, “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia,” Kingly, Priesthood of All Believers, Prophetic, Sentinels, Soul Friends, Storytellers, and Worshippers.

Priesthood of All Believers

1 Peter 2:9-10 speaks to the idea of the priesthood of all believers, saying, “But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; who once were not a people but are now the people of God, who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy.” In addition to the collective priestly authority of elders in general and of Presbyters of the Church in particular, there is the general priestly authority of individuals.

Also see “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia.

Primary Disciplines

The primary disciplines of Basileia are journey, assemble, listen, govern and serve. We observe each discipline by engaging in Christlike practices that are, like Jesus, priestly, prophetic and kingly. For example, we observe our primary discipline of journey by engaging in the Christlike practices of Eucharistic worship (priestly), the Daily Office (prophetic) and contemplative prayer (kingly).

Also see Charism.

Private Capacity

Private capacity is the capacity or authority of individual men and women exercised in individual governance in contrast to the public capacity or authority exercised by men as elders on behalf of collectives in collective governance. Westerners tend to emphasize the private capacity of individuals in individual (or self) governance while having a blind spot about the covenantal role of elders in the exercise of collective governance. A kingdomcultural understanding of governance upholds the equal value but different functions of private capacity along side of public capacity. The two complement each other instead of compete against or cancel each other.

Also see Collective Governance, Egalitarianism, “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia,” Individual Governance, Kingly, Priestly, Prophetic, Public Capacity, and Traditionalism.

Prophetic

Prophetic authority is given to mankind in general, along with priestly and kingly authority. Jesus identifies Himself as being the embodiment of the prophetic when He says, “I am…the truth” (Jn. 14:6). As Basileians, we cultivate this prophetic way of embodying truth as 1) Global Pilgrims who pray the Daily Office, 2) Celtic Community-Builders who cultivate colonies of heaven on earth, 3) Pattern-Keepers who interpret the Word according to the Apostolic Rule of Faith, 4) Friends of God who make consensus decisions that bind and loose, and 5) Ambassadors who advance the Kingdom through our vocational callings. We distinguish between the general prophetic teaching authority of individuals and the special, collective prophetic teaching authority of elders in general and of Presbyters of the Church in particular. When individuals teach, they are to do so “in private.” Thus both men and women may speak and teach other men and women “in private,” whether one or more people are assembled. But only elders are to speak and teach “in public” even if only “two or three are gathered.” This explains why in some “public” situations women as individuals, for example, may not teach (1 Tim. 2:12) whereas all members of God's covenant community, in their capacity as self-governing individuals, are to teach and defend the truth in “private” (2 Cor. 10:4-5; 1 Pet. 3:15). Making this distinction between private and public modes of the prophetic is necessary to the proper administration of prophetic authority in binding and loosing. The phrase “binding and loosing” was a technical term in Rabbinic Judaism for the authority of rabbis in teaching and discipline. The close connection between teaching and discipline is derived from the confessional nature of the covenantal administration of authority, whether in an individual or collective capacity. Judicial decisions, for example, are to be made in a ministerial (objective), not a mediatorial (subjective) way. Therefore, all ministerial decisions must be defensible on the objective basis of the Apostolic Rule of Faith as revealed in Scripture, by the Spirit and through creation. Such a “defense” requires that both individuals and collectives (via elders) be able to teach in private and public ways, respectively. Discipleship is not just a private matter or a public matter. It is both. Individuals and collectives are both to be disciples and to disciple. When Jesus commands His followers to make disciples of collective nations (Matt. 28:19-20), this means making disciples of nations as corporate persons, not just individual persons (although this will naturally happen at the same time.) Westerners more than Easterners have difficultly with the concept of corporate persons because the West has for centuries championed the cause of individuals over collectives, reducing the idea of what a collective is to something impersonal at best and inherently evil at worst. Therefore, we carefully distinguish between private and public modes of prophetic authority as exercised by men and women individually and elders collectively in order to properly relate them.

Also see Ambassadors, Celtic Community-Builders, Friends of God, Global Pilgrims, “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia,” Kingly, and Priestly.

Public Capacity

Public capacity is the capacity or authority exercised by men as elders on behalf of collectives in collective governance in contrast to the private capacity or authority of individual men and women exercised in individual governance. Easterners tend to emphasize the public capacity of men (and sometimes also of women) in collective governance, while having a blind spot about the covenantal role of men and women in the exercise of individual governance. A kingdomcultural understanding of governance upholds the equal value but different functions of public capacity along side of private capacity. The two complement each other instead of compete against or cancel each other.

Also see Collective Governance, Egalitarianism, “Governing Roles of Men and Women in Basileia,” Individual Governance, Kingly, Priestly, Private Capacity, Prophetic, and Traditionalism.